Lilisity

Assisted Living

A R D C Scottsdale Home

8632 East Pecos Lane, Scottsdale, AZ 85250 · Map
Licensed for 9 residents

State license active
Is this your community? Claim this listing

A R D C Scottsdale Home is a state-licensed assisted living community in Scottsdale, Arizona. It is licensed for 9 residents. Lilisity publishes no score or ranking for this community; the details below come from the state licensing record.

Assisted LivingCare offered
9 residentsLicensed capacity
State licensedAssisted living home-directed
$3,400 to $4,900/moTypical assisted living start in Maricopa County, from 65 communities that publish prices

Prices

This community does not publish its prices.

Area costs

Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price.

Lilisity’s independent report

What the public record shows

Gathered by Lilisity from state and federal sources. Communities can’t edit this part of the page.

State inspections

19Deficiencies cited
4Complaint inspections

Last inspection: Jul 14, 2026. See the record

License

Active, 9 residents

Assisted Living Home-Directed AL4977H.

Nearest emergency room

2.5 miles

Honorhealth Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center, rated 3 of 5 stars by CMS.

Side by side with nearby communities

The 4 nearest communities that offer assisted living, by straight-line distance. Prices are starting prices each community publishes; we never show estimates.

CommunityDistanceLicensed capacityPublished starting priceLicenseInspection citations
A R D C Scottsdale Home this community9Not publishedActive19 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
Plaza Assisted Living0.2 mi10Not publishedActive4 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
Chaparral Home Care0.3 mi10Not publishedActive7 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
Hazelwood Manor Assisted Living0.9 mi10Not publishedActive1 deficiency, 0 enforcement cases
Tranquility Assisted Living Home1.0 mi10Not publishedActive3 deficiencies, 0 enforcement cases
State inspection record19 deficiencies, 3 enforcement cases
Last inspection
July 14, 2026
Inspections
6, 19 deficiencies cited
Complaint inspections
4, 2 with deficiencies cited
Enforcement cases
3, $5,750 in civil penalties
  • No deficiencies cited at the last 2 inspections (February 2026 to July 2026)
  • License active since 2004

Enforcement cases

October 30, 2025: complaint inspection, 5 deficiencies

  • Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
    Based on documentation review, observation, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. The deficient practice posed a risk if a staff member was not properly trained to assist a resident who had fallen and was unable to recover independently.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 10, 2025
  • Health care institutions; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; first aid; immunity; falls; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.B.2
    Based on record review and interview, the health care institution failed to provide appropriate first aid to a non-injured resident who had fallen, appeared to be uninjured, and was unable to reasonably recover independently, for one of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk to the resident's safety and wellbeing.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 10, 2025
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.2.a-b
    Based on documentation review, observation, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that an assistant caregiver interacted with residents under the supervision of a manager or caregiver. The deficient practice posed a risk as the individual was not qualified to provide the required services.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 10, 2025
  • Residency and Residency Agreements R9-10-807.B.1.a-b
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident accepted by the assisted living facility submitted documentation dated within 90 calendar days before acceptance and signed and dated by a medical practitioner or a registered nurse that stated whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, for one of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 5, 2025
  • Emergency and Safety Standards R9-10-819.D.2.a-f
    Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure when a resident had an accident, emergency, or injury that resulted in the resident needing medical services, a caregiver documented any action taken to prevent the incident from occurring in the future. The deficient practice posed a potential risk of re-injury.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 5, 2025

October 20, 2025: complaint inspection, 12 deficiencies

  • Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
    Based on documentation review, observation, interview, and record review, the governing authority failed to administer a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. The deficient practice posed a risk if a staff member was not properly trained to assist a resident who had fallen and was unable to recover independently.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 3, 2025
  • Tuberculosis Screening R9-10-113.A.1-2
    Based on documentation review, observation. Interview, and record review, the chief administrative officer failed to establish and document tuberculosis (TB) infection control activities consistent with this rule and implement TB infection control activities including annually providing training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB, for five of seven sampled employees. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 5, 2025
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.9
    Based on documentation review, observation, interview, and record review, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-411(C), for six of seven sampled employees. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employees were a danger to a vulnerable population.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 10, 2025
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.1.a-b
    Based on interview, documentation review, and record review, the governing authority failed to ensure a caregiver provided documentation of completion of a caregiver training program approved by the Department or the Board of Examiners for Nursing Care Institution Administrators and Assisted Living Facility Managers (NCIA Board), for one of four caregivers sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the individual was not qualified to provide the required services.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 7, 2025
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.4.a-b
    Based on documentation review, observation, interview, and record review, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver’s or an assistant caregiver’s skills and knowledge were verified and documented before the caregiver or assistant caregiver provided physical health services, for five of six sampled applicable personnel members. The deficient practice posed a risk if a caregiver or an assistant caregiver did not have the skills and knowledge necessary to meet a resident's needs.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 10, 2025
Show all 9
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.8.a-b
    Based on documentation review, interview, observation, and record review, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver and an assistant caregiver provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) on or before the date the individual began providing services at or on behalf of the assisted living facility as specified in Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R9-10-113, for four of seven sampled personnel members. The deficient practice posed a potential TB exposure risk to residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 5, 2025
  • Personnel R9-10-806.A.10
    Based on documentation review, interview, and record review, the manager failed to ensure the manager provided current documentation of first aid training certification specific to adults before providing assisted living services to a resident, for one of one manager. The deficient practice posed a risk if a manager was unable to meet a resident's needs during an emergency.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 7, 2025
  • Medical Records R9-10-811.A.5
    Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident's medical record was protected from loss, damage, or unauthorized use. The deficient practice posed a risk of protected sensitive resident health information being disclosed without the resident's consent or knowledge.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: November 5, 2025
  • and 4 more in the report

April 16, 2025: compliance (annual) inspection, 2 deficiencies

  • Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definition A.R.S. § 36-420.01.A
    Based on the record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that the healthcare institution administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery, which included both initial training and continued competency training for one of the three personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk for residents.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: June 19, 2025
  • Administration R9-10-803.A.9
    Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the governing authority failed to ensure compliance with Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-411(A), for one of three sampled employees. The deficient practice posed a risk if the individual was a danger to a vulnerable population.
    Plan of correction accepted; correction date given by the community: April 18, 2025

Other inspection reports

  • June 20, 2025: modification inspection. An off-site desktop review to increase licensed capacity from nine (9) to ten (10) was completed on June 20, 2025. Read the Statement of Deficiencies on AZ Care Check.

Inspections with no deficiencies listed

  • July 14, 2026: complaint, compliance (annual) inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaint 00175639 conducted on July 14, 2026.
  • February 6, 2026: complaint inspection. No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaints 00152791, 00152554, and 00152104 conducted on February 6, 2026

Read the full record on AZ Care Check →

ADHS writes a Statement of Deficiencies after each inspection that finds a rule was not met. The community then files a plan of correction, which ADHS accepts or rejects. ADHS investigates complaints on site. A complaint inspection that ends with “No deficiencies were found” did not find a rule violation; deficiencies cited on a complaint inspection are listed with that inspection. AZ Care Check does not list complaints that did not lead to an on-site inspection. Enforcement cases are actions ADHS takes after an inspection, such as a civil money penalty, a provisional license or a license revocation, with their status. This community is licensed for 9 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services, AZ Care Check, data as of October 15, 2026, showing all records on AZ Care Check (back to September 5, 2023). Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.

License and ownershipActive license
License type
Assisted Living Home-Directed
License number
AL4977H
License status
Active
Licensed capacity
9

Source: Arizona state licensing records (agency listing), retrieved 2026-09-09. Licensing status is a matter of public record; it is not a quality rating.

Paying with Medicaid and other programsHow Medicaid pays for care in Arizona, and other programs

How Medicaid pays for care in Arizona

  • Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS). Yes. Arizona's Medicaid long-term care program, ALTCS, is for people who need nursing facility level of care. Members do not have to live in a nursing home, and many live in an assisted living facility and get needed services there. (state page)

Ask the community whether it accepts Medicaid.

Location and nearby careNearest hospital 2.5 mi, nursing home 2.5 mi, pharmacy 0.5 mi
Nearest hospital with an emergency room
Honorhealth Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center, Scottsdale. 2.5 miles away, straight line. CMS overall hospital rating: 3 of 5 stars.
Nearest Medicare nursing home
Heritage Court Post Acute of Scottsdale, Scottsdale. 2.5 miles away, straight line.
Nearest home health agency office
Kpg Home Health, LLC, Scottsdale. 2.1 miles away, straight line. Agencies travel to clients, so ask which ones serve this address.
Nearest pharmacy
Walgreens. 0.5 miles away, straight line. From OpenStreetMap, which does not list every pharmacy, so one may be closer.
Area
USDA classes ZIP code 85250 as metropolitan (metropolitan core).
Dialysis within 15 miles
032648-Fmc Old Town Scottsdale, Scottsdale, 2.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
032594 Salt River Dialysis Center (Fmc), Scottsdale, 2.8 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 4 of 5 stars)
Davita Desert Mountain Dialysis Center, Scottsdale, 4.2 miles away, straight line (CMS rating 2 of 5 stars)
Hospice
51 Medicare hospices tell CMS they serve ZIP code 85250.
Sage Hospice And Palliative Care, office in Scottsdale, 1.8 miles away, straight line (CMS family survey rating 3 of 5 stars)
Ascension Hospice LLC, office in Scottsdale, 2.0 miles away, straight line
Uplift Hospice, office in Scottsdale, 2.2 miles away, straight line
Nearest geriatric medicine practice
Scottsdale Inpatient Specialists Plc, Scottsdale. 4.6 miles away, straight line. 1 geriatric medicine doctor listed there.

Distances are straight lines from the community, not driving distance. Hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors come from CMS provider data (CMS, hospital list updated Jul 22, 2026). Star ratings are CMS’s own.

Emergency and natural hazard riskFEMA overall risk relatively high; outside FEMA's high-risk flood areas

Public hazard maps for this location. Ask the community about its emergency plan, its generator and where residents would go in an evacuation.

Flood zone
Outside the high and moderate risk flood areas on FEMA's flood map (Zone X, minimal flood hazard, or not studied). (FEMA flood map)
FEMA National Risk Index
Overall: relatively high. By hazard: hurricane very low, inland flooding very high, tornado very low, heat wave very high, earthquake relatively low. These are FEMA’s ratings for the census tract, compared with tracts nationwide. (FEMA, December 2025)

A flood zone describes the map at this point, not the building's elevation. In an emergency, follow the local emergency management agency.

Questions to ask on a tour10 questions picked for this community from its record

Picked for this community from its record. Ask them in person and write down the answers.

  1. The state recorded a finding in October 2025. What was it, and how was it fixed?
  2. What does the base rate include, and when did rates last go up?
  3. Who is here at night? Are they awake, or asleep and on call?
  4. Who covers when the owner is sick, on vacation, or away for the day? Can we meet them?
  5. Is it one flat rate, or does it rise with care needs?
  6. Can you help someone who needs two people to move, or a mechanical lift?
  7. How many caregivers are on duty during the day and at night?
  8. What happens if care needs increase? When would someone need to move?
  9. What fees are charged at move-in?
  10. How do you tell families about falls, illness or changes?
What we checked11 public sources we searched, with dates

Every public source we searched for this community. “Nothing on record” means we found no record that matched it. A record can be missed when a name or address differs.

SourceData as ofWhat we found
Arizona Department of Health Services, Licensing Services inspection recordsOct 15, 2026See above
U.S. Department of Labor wage and hour casesOct 15, 2026Nothing on record
OSHA workplace safety inspections since 2016Oct 15, 2026Nothing on record
FEMA flood mapSee above
USDA wildfire riskApr 15, 2026Not shown: no FEMA wildfire rating of moderate or higher here
FEMA National Risk IndexSee above
CMS hospitals, home health, dialysis, hospice and doctors; OpenStreetMap pharmaciesSee above
HUD Multifamily Properties - AssistedJul 6, 2026Nothing on record
State Veterans Homes (NASVH directory)Sep 20, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Hospice - General InformationAug 19, 2026Nothing on record
CMS Home Health Care AgenciesMay 27, 2026Nothing on record
Common questionsAnswers to 4 questions families ask
What type of care does A R D C Scottsdale Home provide?

A R D C Scottsdale Home is licensed by the state of Arizona for assisted living in Scottsdale, Arizona. Its licensed capacity is 9 residents.

Does Lilisity rate A R D C Scottsdale Home?

No. We publish state licensing details for A R D C Scottsdale Home but no score, rating, or ranking. Only communities on the Top Communities list or with a Senior Living Alliance Excellence Award, both based on phone-verified resident and family interviews, are ranked.

How much does A R D C Scottsdale Home cost?

Assisted Living in Maricopa County typically starts at $3,400 to $4,900 a month. Based on 65 communities that publish prices. These are area figures, not this community's price. A R D C Scottsdale Home does not publish its prices.

How do I contact A R D C Scottsdale Home?

Visit A R D C Scottsdale Home at 8632 East Pecos Lane, Scottsdale, AZ 85250.

Choosing a small care homeOur care guide: what to look for, what it costs, how families pay, and more questions to ask (PDF)

Report a wrong fact

How Lilisity works. The only scores or rankings Lilisity publishes are the Top Communities list and the Excellence Awards, both built from phone-verified resident and family interviews. Communities can pay Lilisity a flat monthly fee to manage their own listing: photos, prices, contact details, and receiving the inquiries families choose to send them. The fee is the same no matter how many families contact them or move in. Senior Living Alliance, which runs Lilisity, offers the same listing to its member communities as part of their membership; members pay SLA for its resident and family interview program. No community pays Lilisity per inquiry, per referral or per move-in. Payment never changes a testimonial, a rating, or the order of search results. The "Nearby Senior Living Alliance communities" box shows member communities only. How we verify testimonials · How we are paid