Summer Village Magnolia Place

License status

Regular

Last survey posted

August 12, 2026

Surveys posted

3

Deficiencies cited

36

Substantiated complaints

3

Surveys

• August 12, 2026 (Licensure): no deficiencies cited report
• April 15, 2025 (Licensure/Complaint): 26 deficiencies cited, 3 complaints substantiated, 2 complaints unsubstantiated report plan of correction
  The deficient practices resulted in the potential for significant harm for all residents and require a plan of correction.
  • Administration: The Specialty Care Assisted Living Facility Governing Authority. ADPH found: “The governing authority failed to adequately oversee the administrator to ensure the facility operated in compliance with the SBOH rules for SCALFs.” Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. ADPH noted this as a repeat deficiency from the survey of FEBRUARY 1, 2018. 420-5-20-.03(1)(a)(b)(c)(d)
  • Administration. ADPH found: “The facility failed to implement its written policies and procedures.” 420-5-20-.03(e)
  • Administration: Responsibility. ADPH found: “EI#1, the administrator, failed to adequately perform her duties to ensure the proper and safe management of the day to day operations of the facility.” 420-5-20-.03(2)(a)
  • Administration: Protection. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure the license was current for an employee acting as administrator.” Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.03(2)(d)
  • Personnel. ADPH found: “The facility was not staffed with at least the minimum required staff at all times.” Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.04(1)(2)
  Show all 26

  • Personnel: Employee Screening. ADPH found: “A newly employed staff member was not properly screened prior to hire and resident contact.” 420-5-20-.04(3)
  • Personnel: Training. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure staff completed all required training.” 420-5-20-.04(9)
  • Records and Reports: General. ADPH found: “The facility failed to maintain records and make them available to the surveyors.” 420-5-20-.05(1)
  • Records and Reports: Residents' Rights. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and were free from chemical restraint.” 420-5-20-.05(3)(d)
  • Records and Reports: Incident Investigation. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure incident investigations were completed and requested information was provided to the ALF unit.” ADPH noted this as a repeat deficiency from the survey of FEBRUARY 1, 2018. 420-5-20-.05(3)(h)
  • Care of Residents: Medical Direction and Supervision. ADPH found: “The facility failed to follow physician orders.” ADPH noted this as a repeat deficiency from the survey of FEBRUARY 1, 2018. 420-5-20-.06(1)
  • Care of Residents: Initial Assessment. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure the Registered Nurse (RN) or Care Coordinator completed an aphasia screening of prospective residents prior to admission, completed monthly assessments as required, ensured weights were obtained and recorded monthly and performed comprehensive assessments to address declines in health status, behaviors, lethargy and over-sedation.” ADPH noted this as a repeat deficiency from the survey of APRIL 27, 2021. 420-5-20-.06(3)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)
  • Care of Residents: Mechanical Restraint and Seclusion. ADPH found: “The facility treated a resident who exhibited emergency behavioral symptoms with anti-anxiety and anti-psychotic medications.” Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.06(3)(j)
  • Care of Residents: Personal Care and Services. ADPH found: “The facility failed to develop a current plan of care which contained interventions to meet the care and safety needs of residents.” ADPH noted this as a repeat deficiency from the survey of APRIL 27, 2021. 420-5-20-.06(4)(a)(b)
  • Care of Residents: Medications. ADPH found: “The facility failed to ensure the medication cart was locked when unattended.” 420-5-20-.06(5)(i)(j)(k)(l)(m)
  • Care of Residents: Admission. ADPH found: “The facility admitted a resident in need of hospice services, whose PSMS score exceeded the allowable score in physical ambulation and who was resistive to care.” Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. 420-5-20-.06(9)(a)
  • Care of Residents: Retention. ADPH found: “The facility failed to discharge or transfer a resident who demonstrated behaviors or symptoms which interfered with the rights or safety of other residents as well as the safety and well-being of the individual resident.” Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. ADPH noted this as a repeat deficiency from the survey of APRIL 27, 2021. 420-5-20-.06(9)(b)
  • Food Service: Food Handling Procedures. ADPH found: “The facility failed to properly label food products and to ensure adequate equipment and measures were used to prevent food contamination.” ADPH noted this as a repeat deficiency from the survey of OCTOBER 4, 2022. 420-5-20-.07(2)
  • Physical Facilities: Food Service Facilities. ADPH found: “The facility failed to maintain cleanliness of the kitchen floors and equipment.” 420-5-20-.08(4)
  • Laundry: General. ADPH found: “The facility failed to provide adequate, effective and clean lint traps in all dryers.” 420-5-20-.09(1)(2)
  • Sanitation and Housekeeping: Sanitation. ADPH found: “The facility failed to maintain water temperature, accessible to residents, no greater than 110 degree Fahrenheit as required.” ADPH noted this as a repeat deficiency from the survey of FEBRUARY 1, 2018. 420-5-20-.10(1)
  • Sanitation and Housekeeping: Housekeeping and Physical Plant Maintenance. ADPH found: “The facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, decent, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and public.” 420-5-20-.10(2)
  • Fire and Safety: General. ADPH found: “The facility failed to perform fire drills as required.” 420-5-20-.11(1)
  • Physical Environment: Buildings and Grounds. ADPH found: “The facility failed to maintain facility equipment in safe operating condition.” 420-5-20-.12(1)
  • Physical Environment: General Building Requirements - Group and Congregate. ADPH found: “The facility failed to have an operable call system.” Cited as a result of a complaint investigation. ADPH noted this as a repeat deficiency from the survey of APRIL 27, 2021. 420-5-20-.12(5)
  • Physical Environment: Additional Requirements for Specialty Care Assisted Living Facilities. ADPH found: “The facility failed to provide a gate that was easily unlockable from either side, along the discharge path of travel from the building egress doors to the public way.” 420-5-20-.12(8)
• October 4, 2022 (Initial Licensure): 10 deficiencies cited report plan of correction
  The deficient practices resulted in the potential for harm to all residents and require a plan of correction.
  • Personnel: Training. ADPH found: “The facility failed to provide documentation of current CPR certification for an employee.” 420-5-20-.04(9)
  • Records and Reports: Incident Investigation. ADPH found: “The facility failed to investigate an incident involving bruising to a resident.” 420-5-20-.05(3)(h)
  • Care of Residents: Medical Direction and Supervision. ADPH found: “The facility failed to follow a physician's order for a resident.” 420-5-20-.06(1)
  • Care of Residents: Initial Physical Examination. ADPH found: “Residents' Physical Examination records were incomplete.” 420-5-20-.06(2)(a)(b)(c)
  • Care of Residents: Initial Assessment. ADPH found: “Resident assessments were not completed as required.” 420-5-20-.06(3)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)
  Show all 10

  • Care of Residents: Personal Care and Services. ADPH found: “Residents' care plans did not reflect the current status of the residents and did not contain interventions to meet the care and safety needs of the residents.” 420-5-20-.06(4)(a)(b)
  • Care of Residents: Activity Program. ADPH found: “A specific activity program was not documented for management of a resident's wandering behaviors.” 420-5-20-.06(4)(c)(d)(e)(f)
  • Care of Residents: Retention. ADPH found: “The facility retained residents who did not meet the criteria for retention in a SCALF.” 420-5-20-.06(9)(b)
  • Food Service: Food Handling Procedures. ADPH found: “Facility staff failed to wear proper clothing and hair restraints when serving food.” 420-5-20-.07(2)
  • Sanitation and Housekeeping: Sanitation. ADPH found: “The facility was not free of objectionable odors.” 420-5-20-.10(1)

ADPH also lists 3 earlier surveys, back to 2014.

Search ADPH’s deficiency reports for license P4102 →

ADPH posts each survey’s Statement of Deficiencies as a PDF (older ones are scans, which we read by OCR). From each report we show the deficiency tags, the rules they cite, ADPH’s own one-sentence finding and the complaint outcomes ADPH states; each cited rule is named in the rule’s own words (Alabama Administrative Code, chapter 420-5-4 for assisted living and 420-5-20 for specialty care assisted living). The report, and the facility’s plan of correction when ADPH posts it, are the official record. Some reports list a complaint as substantiated with no deficiency cited; we show both as ADPH wrote them. This community is licensed for 42 residents; larger communities are inspected and reported on more often, so read counts with size in mind. Source: Alabama Department of Public Health, Bureau of Health Provider Standards, data as of October 15, 2026, showing surveys from the last five years. Always visit in person and ask the community about anything listed here.